Bloody Cars


Car still king, daddy-o


The Turcot project’s foes claim the new plan for replacing the aging interchange is something straight out of the 1950s


June 2, 2011


The 50s get a bad rap. Occasionally we remember the innovations that produced rock music, meat-and-Jell-O dishes and eerily un-self-conscious horror movies, but mostly the decade gets marched out as a metaphor for a naïve time when the sexes stuck to their own spheres, communists were intent on destroying our way of life and the automobile reigned supreme. Such is the criticism currently being levelled against the Quebec government and the Tremblay administration for their plans to reconstruct the Turcot interchange in St-Henri. “This whole project is based on principles that were maybe modern in the 1950s but are completely retro in 2011,” says Shannon Franssen, spokesperson for Mobilisation Turcot, a coalition of organizations that want to see a more environmentally friendly plan for the interchange.

“This whole project is based on principles that were maybe modern in the 1950s, but are completely retro in 2011,” says Shannon Franssen, spokesperson for Mobilisation Turcot, a coalition of organizations that want to see a more environmentally-friendly plan for the interchange.

The Turcot’s spirals of cement are a memento of the days when concrete was the material of the future. But like so many visions of the millennium seen from the fifties, they have crumbled with the weight of time. For the past three years, municipal and provincial governments have been arguing with residents and environmentalists about how best to rebuild the highway. After the initial plan met with criticism for being car-centric, including a damning report from the Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement (BAPE), the Province went back to the drawing board.

“They put a lot of money into a public relations campaign to make it look as if they’d taken into consideration the recommendations from the BAPE, but the new plan is essentially the same project they originally proposed,” says Franssen.

Opponents of the plan have demanded that more focus be put on public transit. The new plan includes a bus lane that runs the length of the new section, but doesn’t join up with bus lanes before or after. “It’s basically a bus lane that goes nowhere,” says Franssen. “They added that as a cosmetic nod to the request for public transit but it’s pretty ineffective.”

Mobilisation Turcot is holding a demo this Saturday to put pressure on both levels of government to adopt a more public transit-friendly plan. Instead of their usual march through St-Henri, near the interchange itself, they will be bringing their protest to the Plateau.
Franssen insists that this is not just an issue for the south-west. “The south-west has been very vocal and active against the Turcot designs since the very beginning, but this is a Montreal issue. The amount of pollution caused by bringing more cars into the city will affect everyone.”

Still, going to the Plateau with its abundance of Bixis and undersized one-speed bikes only scratches the surface of the problem. Franssen acknowledges that tension with suburban drivers won’t go away without serious investment in public transit in the burbs.

“People in the suburbs need their cars because there’s no public transit infrastructure. We need more trains going to the suburbs. Most of the traffic on the Ville Marie is people going from one neighbourhood to another in Montreal. If we provide public transit infrastructure then many of those people will not be on the highway. Being on the highway in traffic is not fun.”

The demo takes place this Saturday June 4 at 3 p.m. behind the faux-railcar that houses the Pizzaiolle by Laurier metro (4801 St-Denis). To emphasize the backwardness of the current plans, participants are encouraged to dress in their best fifties garb. See mobilisation-turcot.info for more information.
Montreal Mirror June 2, 2011 (this is the unedited text)

Comments

Popular Posts